Flight Path

Here is a semi-accurate recap of the drone's flight path during the video. Keep this path in mind as it is crucial for concluding the drone's use of gravitic propulsion. Keep in mind that the drone descended for its entire flight until it rotated towards the ground at around the 4.5-second mark. Later, I will provide you with my complete witness testimony and a flight path of what I witnessed before I started recording the video, when the drone was at window level for around 30 seconds and less than 60 feet directly in front of me. After the last point on the photo, the drone exited my FOV.

Redshift, Blueshift, & Black Trail

In person, the drone never emitted any color or light besides a red light at the top and bottom of the device. These two lights were necessary for the operator to control the drone and remained constant throughout the entire flight. The red-orange glow in the middle of the drone is caused by the light behind the drone being pulled into the drone's spacetime expansion zone, not a red light source within the drone. This explains why this phenomenon is most visible when the drone's center aligns directly with the camera and disappears once the drone rotates. The blue, purple, and green you see in the drone's wake is a blueshift of light due to spacetime compressing in its wake. These effects occur because the drone’s propulsion system operates by warping spacetime, expanding space ahead of its path and compressing it behind. Unlike a conventional propulsion system that must expel mass in the opposite direction to generate thrust, this field-based alteration allows the drone to fly by shifting its localized warp bubble through the surrounding environment.On video, the redshift starts from the direction of the drone's travel, and the blueshift begins in the opposite direction, aligning perfectly with existing theories of an Alcubierre-type anti-gravity drone that compresses spacetime in front and stretches spacetime in its wake. This effect is only apparent on camera due to the camera's ability to capture frequency shifts that the human eye can not see. This also perfectly coincides with the two periods of time dilation that I observed as the drone was only ~50 feet in front of me, and while it passed directly overhead.

Warped Middle

In person, the middle of the drone was transparent and shaped like a tube. There were two extremely thin sheets of metal on both sides of the drone, connecting the top and bottom lights with the tubular middle. The middle of the drone warped the light directly behind it, with the warped light always following a wave pattern. While the drone was operating in the street directly in front of my window, it was pointed directly at me the entire time, which lasted around 30 seconds. I had a clear view of the drone’s core while it was ascending vertically and angled upright, as shown in these pictures. At this time, the drone was ~5 feet above the ground on the opposite sidewalk, positioned directly in front of my apartment window as it slowly ascended. The warp never appeared to contain straight lines or jagged edges, just multiple moving waves converging towards the very center of the drone. The graffiti on the wall behind the sidewalk was distorted in an oscillating wave pattern. Looking through the center of the drone, I vividly remember the grass above the wall bleeding into the graffiti in a U-shape. From my point of view, the graffiti was behind the top-middle section of the drone. The grass behind the graffiti appeared black instead of green when viewed through the drone's center. Each wave pattern in the drone would constantly move as the drone climbed, and new waves emerged from each direction every second or so. The waves emerging from the side of the drone moved horizontally, while those from the top and bottom moved vertically towards the center. However, I can not remember with 100% confidence if the waves were oscillating or if new waves were emerging from the outside of the drone. The very center of the drone's core featured no waves, indicating that it was either the attractor or source of the wave patterns. The drone appeared to move the slowest during this period, and I observed this vertical climb for ~6 seconds. Aside from this slow climb directly in front of my apartment window, the drone moved at a constant speed throughout its entire flight. Initially, I assumed the drone's core could have been a liquid, as looking through the middle was like looking through a pool of water. If you told me that the core was plasma, I would believe you, but it could have just been the light warping producing that appearance. Each side of the drone is clearly visible in the video, so aside from my eyewitness testimony, you can be entirely sure that the propulsion system is wingless and propellerless, both internally and externally.

Four Flight Modes IRL

In real life, the drone had four distinct modes of travel. In every mode, the top light of the drone led the drone’s travel, while the bottom light trailed behind. Though the drone's angle shifted with each change in mode or direction, the drone’s shape stayed constant the entire time. The first mode I'll describe is its horizontal movement. In this mode, the top light would angle to the left or right at around 30 degrees, and the drone would float in the direction the top light was facing. In this mode, the drone could only travel left or right, not forward, backward, up, or down. The second mode involved a movement where the drone was angled perfectly vertical, and the drone would either ascend or descend. In this mode, the drone could only travel up or down on its vertical plane. The third mode was a wave-like motion that allowed the drone to travel on its horizontal and vertical axes simultaneously. In this mode, the drone swam like a fish through the air, evenly increasing the height of each peak and trough with each new wave. During this mode, the top light was never even with or lower in altitude than the bottom light as it was climbing. In the fourth and final mode, the drone would quickly snap to a 45-degree angle and drift in whatever direction the top light was facing. In this mode, it could only travel horizontally, but it could move in all four directions on its horizontal plane. In this mode, it was even more evident that the drone was effortlessly floating through space. In the other three modes, it was clear that it used no conventional form of propulsion, but in this mode, the drone seemed to relax and effortlessly glide through the air like an object floating through outer space. In this mode, the angular shift of the top light when it changed directions was much quicker and more aggressive than in every other mode.

3 Modes On Camera

The video starts with the drone in its 45-degree mode. This beginning period is the only time during the entire encounter when the drone's top light did not lead its flight. During this period before the redshift is visible, the drone is floating smoothly through the air, akin to an object’s movement in a zero-gravity environment. After the first sensor glitch, the drone moves to its wave-like travel mode, although its movement in this mode is far less pronounced on camera than it was in real life. Remember that during the video, the drone approaches the camera and descends in altitude, although this movement is difficult to tell as the drone does not enlarge on camera. When the drone and its field rotate immediately before the video goes black, at around the 5.5-second mark, the drone switches from its wave-like mode to the mode where it ascends and descends vertically. During this period, the drone rotates so its lights are pointing towards the ground. This means that the mode that once propelled it vertically now propels the drone horizontally. I observed this movement in person, as I got a clear view of the drone passing above the apartment window during this section of the video. At this point, the drone was clearly facing the ground and traveling to the left of the camera.

Never Enlarging & Muted Movement

Despite the drone flying closer to the camera throughout the entire duration of its flight, it never enlarges on camera. It is common knowledge that when you film an object as it is moving closer to you, the size is supposed to increase. From the start to the end of the video, the drone travels ~200 feet towards the camera as it descends in altitude. This discrepancy is impossible under any known technology. The drone’s size, approach, and descent being difficult to discern proves that the warp bubble’s spatial distortion affects apparent distance, depth, and scale, complicating visual tracking. This makes this technology perfect for stealthy operation, as air defense sensors fail to accurately capture the object as it flies through the sky. The drone flying closer to the camera is confirmed by the video blackout at ~5.5s as the camera enters the drone's immediate field.

Changing Shape & Size

One of the most apparent and unusual aspects of the drone is that it appears to change size and shape throughout the video. In real life, the drone was about 2.5 to 3.5 feet long and around one foot wide, with the size and shape remaining constant throughout its entire flight. Despite the size never enlarging on video as it moves closer to the camera, the drone's length and width fluctuate throughout the video. It appears in different sizes on video due to the drone's localized spacetime manipulation. The warp bubble's properties fluctuate, changing how light from the drone is bent and captured. This is best observed when the drone’s redshifted middle points at the camera around frame 65. When this happens, it becomes clear that its gravitational field bends light paths and shifts wavelengths. The camera isn’t capturing the actual lights while the redshift is visible; it’s capturing the warped light from them after it’s passed through the drone’s field. The lights are brown because the wavelength of the warped light in the drone's field is mixing with the red lights on the top and bottom of the drone. The color and shape distortions are perfectly consistent with a warp field actively manipulating light. The same field-based lensing briefly demagnifies the craft around the compression zone, making it appear to shrink in size. This same effect also occurs near the bottom of the craft in the frame immediately before the camera enters the drone's immediate spacetime compression zone.The frame that most closely resembles what I saw in real life is the one in this section where the two red lights are clearly visible. An interesting fact about this frame is that when you rotate it 45 degrees, the drone is angled perfectly vertical. This is noteworthy when you consider the distinct 45-degree mode I witnessed in person and documented before I noticed the rotation anomaly in this frame. The path of light in spacetime diagrams is represented by a 45-degree angle, so I suspect that there’s a connection there, along with it being the orientation where the warp bubble is most stable.

Light Path Redirection As the Drone Passes Overhead

Right before the drone passes overhead and the camera enters the spacetime compression zone, the light from the blind below the camera is pulled towards the drone despite the drone and camera remaining in the same vertical position. This is not due to the camera moving or changing angles; this is clear evidence of light warping caused by the drone's field. During this section, my phone was almost perfectly still, and the blinds remained below the camera throughout the entire video. You can hear that there is no sound indicating the blinds moving, which confirms my testimony. In real life, the drone was also positioned much closer and further to the right than it appears on camera during this period. The lateral discrepancy makes sense given that the front of the drone expands the light in front of it, rendering the camera unable to effectively capture any light in front of the drone when its field is close to the camera. When you look at the bottom right of the video as the blinds converge toward the drone, you will notice the light from the distant star overlays the distorted light of the blinds. This was also previously considered impossible, as light from a distant object never overlays an object in the foreground under normal circumstances.

Foreground Light Manipulation

The drone pushes and pulls the light from the blinds in the foreground throughout its travel on video. The light from the wall to the left of the camera also exhibits this same phenomenon. These are not conventional sensor artifacts. Once again, the only way this could happen is due to localized spacetime manipulation.

Compression Zone

This video is what appears when you apply an optical flow time interpolation to the video. Optical flow is a video analysis method that estimates the motion of pixels between two adjacent frames of a video. Artifacts that are impossible for any non-nation-state video editor to fabricate appear as the drone passes overhead. As the camera entered the immediate blueshift zone in the drone's wake, the drone warped the light captured by the sensor, resulting in imaging errors and anomalies unexplainable by any propulsion system except for gravitic propulsion. During this period, I also experienced time as if it were moving slower. It felt like the car that I captured at the 9-second mark of the video drove down the street a few seconds after I ended the video, rather than immediately after I stopped recording.

Blueshift Zone ISP Error

Immediately as the drone travels overhead, the iPhone's Image Signal Processor (ISP) repeatedly outputs blank frames. These blackouts are due to the drone's field collapsing the imaging pipeline. There is no known propulsion system that can cause these anomalies. For context, the drone was only 10-20 feet above the roof of the apartment and was traveling towards the parking lot behind the apartment. This anomaly occurs as my phone entered the drone's immediate spacetime compression zone, which is also supported by the light converging towards the drone in the frames that immediately precede this phenomenon. The fact that I was shielded by a roof when this phenomenon occurred further proves that the technology powering the drone is field-based and not anything conventional. During this distortion period, the only source that emits photons coherent enough to be translated by the ISP pipeline is the only non-local object in the frame, the distant star. During this period, more light warping anomalies appear as the light from the star and the blinds converge again towards the drone's last visible position, without me moving the camera. This is accompanied by the star overlaying the windowsill again and warping in a path different than the foreground light. The gravitational lensing occurring again during the sensor recovery period proves that the drone's field is persistent and leaves residual effects, along with eliminating the possibility of a conventional camera glitch. The FPS-dependent distortion differences, along with the pixel smearing and pyramid-shaped distortion, indicate that the drone's immediate field causes anomalously fast light changes. No conventional propulsion system can explain this distortion period.

(Volume Up)

Field Shifts & Ambient Noise

A few times throughout the video, you can see the pixels stretch vertically across the entire frame. Each time this shift happens, it is accompanied by a strange rattling sound. I did not hear this noise in person. CMOS camera microphones, especially in phones, can pick up induced noise from high-energy EM fields, rapid power fluctuations, and apparently, warp fields. These sounds occur as soon as the redshift onsets, while the camera is zooming, immediately after the camera finishes zooming, and as soon as the drone starts rotating as it is flying directly overhead. During the camera zoom period, each time the sound is present, the entire frame shifts up a small amount. This proves that the drone’s warp bubble or energy emissions cause timing and electromagnetic disturbances that disrupt the camera’s sensor readout process. The drone's warp bubble likely alters the timing of photon arrivals to the camera sensor, confusing the frame integration and image composition. This is why you see these vertical shifts in light at these three key moments. The rotor-like noise that you hear throughout the video also originates from the drone. In person, the drone was silent the entire time I was directly in front of it. As the drone was above the apartment, I remember thinking that a helicopter flew overhead. Upon checking flight radar data for that night and seeing that there was no helicopter overhead at this time, I realized the overhead sound came from the drone.

Extreme Brightness Changes

During the period when the phone is in the spacetime compression zone and the video is slowed down with optical flow time interpolation, there are a few frames that can not be altered without changing the appearance of the entire section. If you adjust any value in the video, the frame's appearance completely changes. If you alter the frame and re-render it, the distortion reappears. Optical flow's computing algorithms fail to accurately track pixel behavior during the blueshift distortion section, as the scene contains highly anomalous brightness fluctuations. This can be verified by examining the distortion period below and using a brightness change per pixel per frame analysis that I elaborate on in the next section. Corruption is also present throughout the binary hex data of the video, which you can download on the next page, or extract from the raw video file and analyze yourself.