In person, the drone never emitted any color or light besides two red lights at the top and bottom of the device. These two lights were necessary for the operator to control the drone and remained constant throughout the entire flight. The red-orange glow in the middle of the drone is from spacetime itself compressing ahead of the craft, not a red light in the middle of the drone. The blue, purple, and green you see surrounding the drone are a blueshift of light due to spacetime expanding in its wake. These effects occur because the drone’s propulsion system operates by warping spacetime, compressing space ahead of its path and expanding it behind. Unlike a conventional propulsion system that must expel mass in the opposite direction to generate thrust, this alteration allows the drone to fly by shifting its localized warp bubble through space. Imagine the warp bubble surrounding the drone operating like the oars of a boat as they propel the ship forward, but instead of moving water, the drone's core shifts space and time locally.On video, the redshift starts from the direction of the drone's travel, and the blueshift begins in the opposite direction, aligning perfectly with existing theories of an Alcubierre-type anti-gravity drone that compresses spacetime in front and stretches spacetime in its wake. This effect is only apparent on camera due to the camera's ability to capture frequency shifts that the human eye can not see. This also perfectly coincides with the two periods of time dilation that I observed as the drone was only ~50 feet in front of me, and while it passed directly overhead.
In person, the middle of the drone was transparent and clearly shaped like a tube. There were two extremely thin sheets of metal on both sides of the drone, connecting the top and bottom lights with the tubular middle. The middle of the drone warped the light directly behind it, always following a wave pattern. From what I can recall, the warp never appeared to contain straight lines or jagged edges, just multiple moving waves converging towards the very center of the drone. A distinct pattern of the warp that I observed was when the drone was ascending perfectly vertical, while it was angled vertically like the picture "My POV." At this time, the drone was a few feet above the ground on the opposite sidewalk, positioned directly in front of my apartment window. The graffiti on the wall behind the sidewalk was distorted in an oscillating wave pattern. Looking through the center of the drone, the grass above the graffiti bled into the wall in a U-shape. From my point of view at this time, the graffiti was behind the top-middle of the drone. The grass behind the graffiti appeared much darker than its actual color when viewed through the drone's center. Each wave pattern in the drone would constantly move as the drone moved, and new waves emerged from each direction every second or so. The waves emerging from the side of the drone moved horizontally, while those from the top and bottom moved vertically towards the center. However, I can not remember with 100% confidence if the waves were oscillating or if new waves were emerging from the outside of the drone. The drone also appeared to move the slowest during this period. Other than this movement directly in front of my apartment window, the drone moved at a constant speed throughout its entire flight. Initially, I assumed the middle of the drone could have been a liquid, as looking through the middle was similar to looking at an object underwater. If you told me that it was plasma in the middle, I would believe you, but it could have just been the light's warp giving it that appearance. Each side of the drone is visible in the video, so aside from my eyewitness testimony, you can be entirely sure that the propulsion system is wingless and propellerless, both internally and externally.
In real life, the drone had four distinct modes of travel. In every mode, the top light of the drone led the drone’s travel, while the bottom light trailed behind. Though the drone's angle shifted with each mode and direction change, the drone’s shape stayed constant the entire time. The first mode I'll describe is its horizontal movement. In this mode, the top light would angle to the left or right at around 30 degrees, and the drone would float in the direction the top light was facing. In this mode, the drone could only travel left to right, not forward, backward, up, or down. The second mode involved a movement where the drone was angled perfectly vertical, and the drone would either ascend or descend. In this mode, the drone could only travel up or down. In this second mode, the drone could only travel up and down. The third mode was an undulatory, or wavelike, motion that allowed the drone to travel on its horizontal and vertical axes at the same time. In this mode, the drone swam like a fish through the air, evenly increasing the height of each peak and trough with each new wave. During this mode, the top light was never even with or lower in altitude than the bottom light as it was climbing. In the fourth mode, the drone would quickly snap to a 45-degree angle and drift in whatever direction the top light was facing. In this mode, it could only travel horizontally, but it could travel in a straight line in all four horizontal directions. In this mode, it was even more evident that the drone was effortlessly floating through space. In the other three modes, it was clear that it used no conventional form of propulsion, but in this mode, the drone seemed to relax and effortlessly glide through the air like an object floating through outer space. In this mode, the angular shift of the top light when it changed directions was much quicker and more aggressive than in every other mode.
The video starts with the drone in its 45-degree mode. Before the redshift onset, the drone is floating smoothly through the air, akin to an object’s movement in a zero-gravity environment. After the first sensor glitch, the drone moves to its wavelike travel mode, although its movement in this mode is far less pronounced on camera than it was in real life. During the video, the drone approaches the camera and descends in altitude, although this is difficult to tell as the drone does not enlarge on camera. During the final sensor glitch while the drone is in view, the drone switches from its wavelike mode to its mode where it ascends and descends vertically. During this period, the drone rotates so its lights are pointing towards the ground. This means that the mode that once propelled it vertically is now only able to propel the drone horizontally. I observed this movement in person as I witnessed the drone passing above the apartment window, and the drone was facing the ground and traveling to the left of the camera.
Despite the drone flying closer to the camera throughout the entire duration of its flight, it never enlarges on camera. It is common knowledge that when you film an object as it is moving closer to you, the size is supposed to increase. From the start to the end of the video, the drone travels ~200 feet towards the camera as it descends in altitude. This discrepancy is impossible under any known technology. The drone’s size, approach, and descent being difficult to discern proves that the warp bubble’s spatial distortion affects apparent distance, depth, and scale, complicating visual tracking. This makes this technology perfect for stealthy operation, as air defense sensors fail to accurately capture the object as it flies through the sky.
One of the most apparent and unusual aspects of the drone is that it appears to change size and shape throughout the video. In real life, the drone was about 2.5 - 3.5 feet in length, around one foot wide, and the size and shape remained constant throughout its entire flight. Despite the size never enlarging as it moves closer, the drone's length and width fluctuate throughout the video. It appears in different sizes on video due to localized spacetime manipulation. This is best observed when the drone’s redshifted middle points at the camera around frame 65. It becomes clear that its gravitational field bends light paths and shifts wavelengths. Rays from the top and bottom lights are likely steered out of the lens, and their color is pushed outside the sensor’s passbands, so the colors fade to brown tones while only the edges remain. The same lensing briefly demagnifies the craft, making it appear to shrink. This same effect occurs in the frame immediately before the camera enters the drone's immediate spacetime compression zone.The frame that looks closest to what I saw in real life is the one at the bottom. An interesting fact about this frame is that when you rotate it 45 degrees, it is perfectly vertical. The relationship between space and time is said to be at a 45-degree angle, so I suspect that there’s a connection there. This is also noteworthy when you consider the distinct 45-degree mode that I witnessed in person and documented before I noticed the rotation anomaly of this frame.
The drone pushes and pulls the light from the blinds in the foreground throughout its travel on video. The light from the wall to the left of the camera also exhibits this same phenomenon. These are not conventional sensor artifacts. Once again, the only way this could happen is due to localized spacetime manipulation.
Right before the drone passes overhead and the camera enters the spacetime compression zone, the light from the blind below the camera is pulled towards the drone despite the drone and camera remaining in the same vertical position. This is not due to the camera moving or changing angles; this is clear evidence of spacetime warping. During this section, my phone was almost perfectly still, and the blinds were positioned below the camera throughout the entire video. When you look at the bottom right of the video as this happens, you will notice the light from the distant star overlays the distorted light of the blinds. This is also previously said to be impossible, as light from a distant object never overlays an object in the foreground under normal circumstances.
This video is what appears when you apply an optical flow time interpolation to the video. Artifacts that are impossible to fabricate appear as the drone passes overhead. As the camera entered the immediate redshift zone, the drone warped the light captured by the sensor, resulting in imaging errors and anomalies unexplainable by any propulsion system except for gravitic propulsion. Seconds after the video ended and the drone passed overhead, I was placed in the drone's blueshift zone. I experienced time as if it were moving slower. It felt like the car that I captured at the 9-second mark of the video drove down the street a few seconds after I ended the video, rather than immediately after I stopped recording.
Immediately as the drone travels overhead, the iPhone's Image Signal Processor (ISP) returns a blank frame. The blackout is due to a pipeline collapse from extreme light warping. There is no known propulsion system that can cause these anomalies. For context, the drone was only 10-20 feet above the roof of the apartment and was traveling towards the parking lot behind the apartment. This anomaly occurs because my phone entered the drone's spacetime compression zone, which is also supported by the light converging towards the drone in the frames that immediately precede this phenomenon. The fact that I was shielded by a roof when this phenomenon occurred further proves that the technology powering the drone is field-based and not anything conventional. During this distortion period, the only source that emits photons strong and coherent enough to be translated by the ISP pipeline is the only non-local object in the frame, the distant star. During this period, more light warping anomalies appear as the light from the star and the blinds converge towards the drone's last visible position again without me moving the camera, along with the star overlaying the windowsill once more and warping in a different path than the foreground light. The gravitational lensing occurring again during the sensor recovery period proves that the drone's field is persistent and leaves residual effects, along with eliminating the possibility of a conventional camera glitch.
A few times throughout the video, you can see the pixels stretch vertically across the entire frame. Each time this shift happens, it is accompanied by a strange noise. I did not hear this noise in person. CMOS camera microphones, especially in phones, can pick up induced current from high-energy EM fields, rapid power fluctuations, and apparently, warp fields. The noise during these shifts becomes even more apparent when you slow the video down. These sounds occur as soon as the redshift onsets, while the camera is zooming, immediately after the camera finishes zooming, and as soon as the drone starts rotating as it is flying directly overhead. During the camera zoom period, each time the sound is present, the entire frame shifts up a small amount. This proves that the drone’s warp bubble or energy emissions cause timing and electromagnetic disturbances that disrupt the camera’s sensor readout process. The drone's warp bubble likely alters the timing of photon arrivals to the camera sensor, confusing the frame integration and image composition. This is why you see these vertical shifts in light at these three key moments. The rotor-like noise that you hear throughout the video also originates from the drone. In person, the drone was silent while I was directly in front of it. As the drone was above the apartment, I remember thinking that a helicopter flew overhead. Upon checking flight data for the night and seeing that there was no helicopter overhead at this time, I realized the overhead sound came from the drone.
Color scopes are the color values and patterns of an image. They're what editors use to color-correct and analyze the appearance of a frame. What’s unusual about the color scopes in the drone video is that during the interference section, there are separate red, green, and blue values that stretch across the entire frame. These split color values are also visible when adjusting the luminance of earlier frames and after the period where the ISP fails due to the phone entering the drone's extreme spacetime distortion field. More unconventional sensor anomalies can be found during an independent in-depth analysis of the color scopes.
During the period when the phone is in the space-time compression zone and the video is rendered at 20% speed with optical flow time interpolation, there are a few frames that can not be altered without changing the appearance of the entire section. If you adjust any value in the video, the frame's appearance completely changes. If you alter the frame and re-render it, the distortion reappears. Optical flow's computing algorithms fail to accurately track pixel movement during the redshift distortion section, as it contains highly anomalous pixel speeds and movements. This can be verified by examining the distortion period below and using a pixel speed analysis that I elaborate on in the next section. Corruption is also present throughout the binary hex data of the video, which you can extract from the raw video file and analyze yourself.
This is the same video played back at 20% speed across different frame rates. As you can see, the distortion is different across each version, which is highly unusual. These FPS-dependent distortion differences, along with the pixel smearing, indicate that the drone's immediate field causes anomalously fast light movement. Any conventional propulsion system can not explain this distortion period.Sidenote: Ask any AI, "If a drone were flying and manipulating time and space, what would it look like on an iPhone camera?" Unsurprisingly, you will notice the drone video matches most of the prompt's responses.
If you analyze the raw video frame by frame, you will notice multiple black pixel patterns under the drone in the shape of classical and traversable wormhole models. Keep traversable wormholes in mind, as that topic will be revisited in the "Who Has Used This Throughout History" section of the website. Weaponizing spacetime & wormholes is a big no-no. Everybody clap it up for Israel, the United States, and China for this wonderful achievement. Congratulations, God will reward you accordingly!
Matthew Livelsberger started reaching out to different media sources 3 days before his Cybertruck explosion. I started recording the sky 3 nights before the Chinese gravitic propulsion drone attack. In fact, I recorded 21 consecutive videos of the sky, as I had an intuitive feeling that some of the planes were drones. This was the first time in my life that I ever recorded the sky looking for "UFOs". Visit the "Who Am I?" section to see the other drone videos I captured.
Matthew Livelsberger specifically instructed Sam not to release his message until January 1 and warned that China was ready to attack anywhere on the East Coast. You must ask yourself how he accurately predicted the time and location of this Chinese attack despite having no connection to China.
Here is an advanced, high-level, super sophisticated reenactment of its pre-recording flight path. Again, the drone consisted of two bright red lights, two extremely thin sheets of metal on both sides, and a completely transparent, warped middle section. I accurately remember its positioning and most of its movements, although I cannot recall the exact order of the drone's flight path with 100% accuracy. Before it ascended to the sky, I witnessed it in operation in the middle of the street about 40 to 60 feet in front of me. Before its ascent, it was only slightly above window level at its highest point. As I sat upright in my friend's bed daydreaming, I saw an unusually bright red light shining at the window. Once I opened the sunshades in the apartment, I witnessed two bright red lights located near the intersection, slightly above window level, pointing directly at me with the top light angled towards me, and the drone moving laterally in my direction. The middle of the drone featured multiple heatwave-like patterns, which I initially thought were either a liquid or distorted light. Throughout most of its flight, the drone was in the middle of the street, either inside or close to the intersection. Before I opened the sunshades, I had a weird feeling that the light outside was something extremely abnormal. You could say I “felt” the UFO before I saw it. As soon as I looked out the window, my face lit up like a kid in a candy store. I was overcome with nothing but awe, intrigue, and happiness as I observed the drone. I did not feel fear, shock, or worry for even a single second as I watched it gracefully dance through the air. The drone's beauty was indescribable; it felt as if E.T. changed forms and found a new best friend. The device was always in motion, and its speed remained constant except for the part I described earlier. About a second after I first saw the drone, it quickly switched directions by tilting the top light and started moving away from me on its x-axis. After traveling away from me for a second or two, it changed directions in the same manner and began moving toward me again. After this movement, it moved away from me once more, all while staying on the same axis and performing the same top-light tilt maneuver. Once it was near the middle of the intersection, the drone angled its top and bottom lights perfectly vertical before dropping in altitude, moving a few feet closer to the ground. Then, it proceeded to move towards me again, performing its same tilt and side-to-side movement. After this movement, the drone somehow lined up directly in front of me, just a few inches in front of the tree on the opposite sidewalk. At this moment, the drone was ascending at a perfect 90-degree angle relative to the ground, just like the model above. I have no recollection of how the drone ended up directly in front of me from its previous location near the middle of the intersection, as my memory is completely blank. I can not remember the drone descending to this position.
As it began to ascend in front of me, I got the best view of the warp pattern in the middle of the drone. I don't vividly remember every detail about this warp, but I distinctly recall when the grass in the field behind the drone bled into the graffiti wall in a U shape. The warp in the middle was constantly moving and wavelike. I could not determine an exact pattern that the warp was moving in, but I remember seeing multiple continuously cycling and moving U patterns facing in different directions based on their position relative to the center. This is also where I experienced the "double memory" that I mentioned in the next section. After it finished this movement, it travelled in an undulatory motion close to the intersection, but this time it was much closer to the apartment, and just a few inches below window level. As it flew to this position, it didn't fly in a perfectly vertical or horizontal motion on its x and y axes as it did previously; it was swimming in a wave pattern like a dolphin in water. When the drone was close to the edge of the building, it activated "float mode," its next, and in my opinion, its most beautiful mode of flight.
Let me give you a recap of the four modes again. I’ll refer to them as basic mode, vertical mode, wave mode, and float mode. Basic mode represents its axial travel where it travels horizontally; vertical mode represents its y-axis movement; wave mode represents its fluid, non-axial, and wave-like travel; and float mode represents the effortless 45-degree mode. In all four modes, it was clear that there was no visible form of propulsion. However, float mode was by far the most intriguing mode. In this “float mode,” the drone quickly snapped to a 45-degree angle and effortlessly floated through the sky on its x-axis in the direction where the top was angled. In its basic mode, the top light only angled to ~30 degrees for its lateral movement. In float mode, it was clear that the drone was floating on its own medium, completely ignoring the influence of reality. It cycled through this mode a few times as it moved horizontally in all four directions on its x-axis, instantly and effortlessly snapping to a 45-degree angle each time. In the reenactment above, this "float mode" movement is shown after the purple wave pattern, although I only depicted this movement in two directions. At one point, it cycled from this mode back to its normal mode, then back to float mode, all while staying on the same x-axis in the same area, so I am entirely sure that this mode is different than its basic mode. After this movement, it travelled in wave mode as it ascended to the spot where the video starts. Initially, I did not record the drone while it was directly in front of me as I thought the "baby alien" would instantly recognize if I was trying to record it and teleport away. Once I saw that it started ascending at the same speed as it was moving earlier, I was confident of my earlier suspicion that it was a slow baby alien who just learned how to fly. As it ascended, I thought that this was my one and only chance to capture an alien on camera. I quickly reached down to grab my phone and start recording. Right before I started recording, I failed to locate the drone in the sky. However, I knew that it was still in the area as I figured it was still climbing at a constant speed. I just pointed the phone toward where I thought it might be, hoping I hadn't missed my chance. As I started recording, I quickly glanced at the sky and back at the camera to see if it was still there. As I zoomed in, I was unsure if the drone was in the frame, as I only caught a glimpse of it for a split second at the start of the video. I only clearly saw the drone's position in real life at around the video's 5-second mark when it was pointing towards the ground, a position it had never been in before I started recording. I also remember viewing the drone angled downward for much longer than the one second that it's angled this way on video. I initially assumed the lights on the drone stretched across the entire top and bottom; I did not realize the drone was pointed directly at me the entire time before its ascent. I did not understand that the lights were only on one side of the drone until I closely examined the video after Matthew Livelsberger's warning.Immediately after the video, I looked outside to see if anyone on the sidewalk or under the bridge had flown the drone. There was no one present, and no cars were coming down the street except for the black car you see at the 9-second mark. I noticed the black car turning right onto Auburn Pointe Drive, but I assumed it was unrelated, as I didn’t realize that I filmed the car at the end of the video until a few weeks later. I found it extremely strange to see that I filmed the black car as I remembered it driving down the street a few seconds after I stopped recording the video, and not immediately after. I vividly remember first looking to the right of the window to see if there was anyone who flew the drone, before looking to the left, the direction the car came from. I remember seeing the car after I looked to the right and then to the left, which I remember being around 3-5 seconds after the video ended. I later learned this was another example of time dilation from the drone. I didn’t see anyone on the street, so I continued with my assumption that I saw a friendly alien. After this, I walked around the apartment, excited and shocked, with my hands on my head, continuously jumping, running around, and saying "WTF" and "OMG" for about 45 minutes. It was the happiest moment of my life as seeing an alien was at the top of my bucket list, and it looked so welcoming, beautiful, and friendly, and I thought it even gave me a little dance to show how cool it was. I wasn't aware that I was feet away from a top-secret WMD of planetary-level destruction flown by Chinese black ops soldiers on American soil. However, part of me initially knew there was a chance it could be government technology, but I was too caught up in the beauty of the drone to care that much and thought, "If I die, at least I died happily and in a cool way." Initially, I assumed I only saw the drone before I started recording for around 3 to 4 seconds until I realized that 3 to 4 seconds was impossible given its flight path and constant speed. This time dilation I experienced is verifiable by looking at text messages I sent immediately after the attack that do not even slightly match the length of the encounter, all of which I provide later. The entire time on video, the drone also looks much further away than it was in person. At the start of the video, when I caught a quick glimpse, the drone was near the middle of the field in front of the apartment. At the 5.5-second mark of the video, I vividly remember the drone being around 10-20 feet above the roof as it was passing overhead, and it appeared much bigger in person than it was on camera, despite my camera being zoomed during this time. Now, if you believe that I am lying about the drone's flight path, find another location in the area with a clear path and a flat reflective surface that is discreet enough to launch a drone from. You will find none. When I started recording the drone in the sky, it was nearly invisible from my point of view. Consider how I could have recorded this drone if I were not alerted beforehand. I also would not have experienced the biological and conscious effects documented and described in the next section if the drone were not directly in front of me. This situation is far too serious to lie about or even slightly exaggerate any minute detail. Later, I will also provide proof that the Chinese and U.S. governments are fully aware that I witnessed and recorded their most secret technology, and the only "UFO" video ever taken that proves the operational use of this technology, so keep reading.
When the gravitic propulsion drone flew vertically from ground level, positioned directly in front of me, its ascent began directly in front of the orange sign you see under the tree in front of the graffiti. On May 7, the date of this picture and 126 days after the attack, this tree is the only tree on the street struggling to grow leaves. This is a theorized biological effect of spacetime warping on plants.
Secret Service Response
Not impossible per se, but here is something else highly unusual. Less than 72 hours later, a 60-hour-long secret service operation was conducted on the neighboring street. This operation featured a Secret Service bus that had a perfect view of the entire street of the drone's travel 24/7, a Secret Service stingray that explicitly targeted me, and buses cycling every 3-5 minutes for 60 hours straight in multiple directions. Many buses also cycled in the opposite direction from the Jimmy Carter Center, despite there being no Jimmy Carter event-related purpose for this movement. This event received very little promotion and was never busy except for the first hour of the event when FOX 5 was present. I later provide evidence that I was selectively targeted by their IMSI catcher, expand on this "Jimmy Carter" event, and give more evidence of its relation to the drone in the "Who Am I" section. Just like the drone video, all of this is publicly verifiable.
Before you even think to discredit, or believe someone discrediting what Matthew and I are showing you—ANALYZE THE VIDEO AND ALL EVIDENCE YOURSELF. Understand, your opinion is completely invalid until you investigate yourself. Even if you believe me, I encourage you to analyze the video, along with the improbability and interconnectedness of the situation itself, which I will somewhat elaborate on later. Check the metadata, hex data, and any other method you can think of to be sure of its validity. In the next section, I will prove the video's authenticity to the best of my ability. Understand the nature of this technology and the forces that benefit from denying its existence and the video's validity. I have no motive other than to present you with the truth. Can you say the same for your government? Keep reading, it gets far more "impossible" from here.
DRONE VIDEO LINKS:
Proton
https://drive.proton.me/urls/RJC4PYSMRW#05s0O68z093CCatbox
https://files.catbox.moe/lqx4gl.MOVArchive.org
https://archive.org/details/img-4283_202504